Agency Technology Audit
Evaluate Your Stack Across 8 Categories With a Scoring Rubric
By Laksh Pujary, Founder of Autoikigai We build AI employees for insurance agencies.
Why Audit Your Tech Stack
Most agencies accumulate technology the way people accumulate junk drawers. A tool here, a subscription there, none of them talking to each other, half of them underused. You’re paying for 10 tools and getting value from 3.
This audit evaluates your technology across 8 critical categories, scores you 1-5, and identifies exactly where the gaps are.
Scoring Rubric
Use this scale for every category:
SCORE LEVEL DEFINITION
â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”
1 Non-Existent No tool in place. Manual/paper process.
2 Basic Tool exists but outdated, underused, or
poorly configured. Minimal adoption.
3 Functional Tool is current and used regularly but
not integrated. Standalone operation.
4 Optimized Tool is current, well-configured, staff
trained, integrated with other systems.
5 Advanced Tool is best-in-class, fully integrated,
automated workflows, data-driven decisions.
â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”Category 1: Agency Management System (AMS)
What it covers: Core policy management, client data, activity tracking, document storage, carrier interface.
Evaluation Criteria
| Criteria | Score 1 | Score 3 | Score 5 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platform | Spreadsheet or paper | AMS installed but outdated version | Current version of Applied Epic, AMS360, or HawkSoft |
| Data quality | Missing fields, duplicates everywhere | Mostly complete, some cleanup needed | Clean data, regular audits, no orphan records |
| Carrier downloads | Not configured | Some carriers active | All carriers active, auto-filing |
| Activity tracking | Sporadic or none | Logged manually, inconsistent | Auto-logged from email/phone, comprehensive |
| Document management | File cabinets or desktop folders | Scanned into AMS, basic organization | All docs in AMS, indexed, searchable, auto-filed |
| Staff adoption | ”I have my own system” | Used for basics, workarounds common | Fully adopted, workflows enforced |
| Reporting | Run a report once a year (maybe) | Monthly reports for key metrics | Real-time dashboards, exception-based alerts |
Your Score: [ ] / 5
Common Gaps
- Carrier downloads not active for all carriers
- Activity logging inconsistent (some staff skip it)
- Data quality poor (bad addresses, missing emails, duplicate records)
- Not using built-in workflow/automation features
Upgrade Path
- Score 1-2: Implement a modern AMS immediately. This is foundational.
- Score 3: Clean your data, activate all carrier downloads, train staff on full feature set
- Score 4: Enable workflows, connect to other tools via API, build dashboards
Category 2: Comparative Rating
What it covers: Multi-carrier quoting, rate comparison, proposal generation.
Evaluation Criteria
| Criteria | Score 1 | Score 3 | Score 5 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tool | Manually log into each carrier portal | Rater installed, used for some lines | EZLynx or Applied Rater, all lines, all carriers |
| Carrier coverage | N/A | 3-5 carriers in rater | All appointed carriers connected |
| Quote turnaround | Hours to days | Same day | Under 2 hours for PL, same day commercial |
| Proposal output | Manual Word/PDF | Rater-generated basic output | Branded, professional proposals auto-generated |
| AMS integration | None | Manual re-entry | Bi-directional data sync with AMS |
| Quote tracking | No record of lost quotes | Logged in rater but not analyzed | Full pipeline tracking with follow-up automation |
Your Score: [ ] / 5
Common Gaps
- Not all carriers loaded in the rater
- Personal lines only; commercial still quoted carrier-by-carrier
- No integration with AMS (double data entry)
- No tracking of unconverted quotes
Upgrade Path
- Score 1-2: Get EZLynx or Applied Rater. Non-negotiable for efficiency.
- Score 3: Load all carriers, integrate with AMS, set up proposal templates
- Score 4: Add quote follow-up automation, track conversion rates, A/B test proposals
Category 3: Workflow Automation
What it covers: Automated task routing, triggered actions, process enforcement.
Evaluation Criteria
| Criteria | Score 1 | Score 3 | Score 5 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tool | None. Everything is manual. | Basic AMS tasks/suspenses | Dedicated automation platform + AMS workflows |
| Processes automated | 0 | 2-3 basic workflows | 10+ workflows covering all core processes |
| Renewal pipeline | Manual list review | AMS expiration report + manual follow-up | 90-day automated pipeline with multi-channel touches |
| New business onboarding | Ad hoc | Checklist exists but manual | Automated welcome sequence with zero manual steps |
| Claims follow-up | Reactive (client calls us) | Reminders set but inconsistent | Automated weekly updates + escalation triggers |
| Certificate issuance | 10+ minutes each | Templated but manual | Auto-generated from AMS for standard requests |
Your Score: [ ] / 5
Common Gaps
- AMS workflow features exist but aren’t configured
- No automation beyond basic calendar reminders
- Processes depend on individual memory, not system enforcement
- No triggered actions based on data changes
Upgrade Path
- Score 1-2: Start with AMS-native workflows (tasks, suspenses, activities)
- Score 3: Add external automation (email sequences, form-to-AMS pipelines)
- Score 4: Implement AI-powered automation (intelligent routing, predictive triggers)
Category 4: Communication Tools
What it covers: Email, phone, text messaging, client portal, chatbot.
Evaluation Criteria
| Criteria | Score 1 | Score 3 | Score 5 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Personal email, no templates | Business email with basic templates | Email platform with sequences, tracking, templates | |
| Phone | Landline, no recording | VoIP with basic features | VoIP with recording, transcription, AMS integration |
| Text/SMS | Personal cell or none | Business texting available | Automated text sequences, two-way, logged to AMS |
| Client portal | None | Carrier portal links provided | Agency-branded portal with self-service |
| After-hours | Voicemail | Answering service | AI phone agent with intake capability |
| Email tracking | None | Read receipts | Open/click tracking with follow-up triggers |
Your Score: [ ] / 5
Common Gaps
- No business text messaging capability
- Phone calls not recorded or transcribed
- No after-hours lead capture
- Client communication not logged to AMS automatically
Upgrade Path
- Score 1-2: Get business VoIP (RingCentral, Nextiva) and business text capability
- Score 3: Add email sequences, phone transcription, AMS email integration
- Score 4: Deploy AI phone agent, client portal, automated text sequences
Category 5: Marketing & Lead Generation
What it covers: Website, SEO, paid ads, social media, referral programs, lead tracking.
Evaluation Criteria
| Criteria | Score 1 | Score 3 | Score 5 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Website | None or decade-old | Modern but static brochure site | Lead-gen optimized with forms, chat, quote request |
| SEO | Not considered | Basic setup, some keywords | Active strategy, local SEO, content production |
| Paid advertising | None | Occasional boosted posts | Systematic campaigns with ROI tracking |
| Social media | Non-existent | Sporadic posting | Consistent content calendar, engagement strategy |
| Referral program | ”We ask sometimes” | Informal, no tracking | Structured program with tracking and incentives |
| Lead tracking | None | Spreadsheet or memory | CRM with source attribution and conversion tracking |
| Content marketing | None | Annual newsletter | Regular blog/video/email with educational content |
Your Score: [ ] / 5
Common Gaps
- Website doesn’t capture leads (no forms, no chat, no quote request)
- No lead source tracking (can’t calculate ROI on any marketing)
- Referral program exists in theory but not in practice
- Social media is sporadic or non-existent
Upgrade Path
- Score 1-2: Build a lead-gen website with quote forms. Start Google Business Profile.
- Score 3: Add CRM, set up referral tracking, launch consistent content
- Score 4: Deploy AI chatbot, predictive lead scoring, multi-channel campaigns
Category 6: Document Management
What it covers: Document storage, retrieval, e-signatures, compliance documentation.
Evaluation Criteria
| Criteria | Score 1 | Score 3 | Score 5 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Storage | Paper files, desktop folders | Scanned to AMS, basic filing | All docs in AMS, auto-filed by carrier downloads |
| Retrieval | Dig through cabinets | Search AMS by client name | Instant retrieval, indexed, tagged, searchable |
| E-signatures | Print, sign, scan, email | DocuSign or similar, ad hoc | Integrated e-sign workflows for all document types |
| Compliance docs | ”It’s in a folder somewhere” | Organized but manual maintenance | Auto-tracked, renewal reminders, audit-ready |
| Client access | Must call/email for copies | Emailed on request | Self-service through client portal |
| Backup | Hope the server holds up | Local backup | Cloud backup, disaster recovery plan, tested |
Your Score: [ ] / 5
Category 7: Accounting & Financial Management
What it covers: Commission tracking, carrier reconciliation, premium trust accounting, financial reporting.
Evaluation Criteria
| Criteria | Score 1 | Score 3 | Score 5 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Commission tracking | Manual spreadsheet, reconciled quarterly | AMS commission module, monthly reconciliation | Auto-reconciled with carrier statements, real-time |
| Premium trust | Manual or outsourced | Basic trust accounting in place | Fully compliant, auto-reconciled, auditable |
| Carrier reconciliation | Annual (if that) | Monthly manual review | Automated matching with exception reporting |
| Financial reporting | Tax time scramble | Monthly P&L reviewed | Real-time dashboard, budgets, forecasting |
| Payroll/producer comp | Manual calculation | Automated but not tied to AMS | Integrated: AMS > commission > comp calculation |
| Contingency tracking | ”We get what we get” | Track payments received | Proactive: track performance vs. thresholds |
Your Score: [ ] / 5
Category 8: Analytics & Reporting
What it covers: Business intelligence, performance metrics, client insights, predictive analytics.
Evaluation Criteria
| Criteria | Score 1 | Score 3 | Score 5 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Retention tracking | ”We think it’s around 85%“ | Annual calculation from AMS report | Monthly tracking by line, producer, and carrier |
| Revenue reporting | Annual, after the fact | Monthly, basic breakdown | Real-time by line, producer, carrier, new vs. renewal |
| Producer scorecards | None | Basic premium/policy counts | Full scorecard: new, renewal, retention, cross-sell, activity |
| Client insights | None | Basic segmentation | CLV, risk scoring, cross-sell propensity, engagement scoring |
| Pipeline visibility | None | List of open quotes | Full pipeline: lead > quote > bind conversion funnel |
| Predictive capability | None | None | AI-powered: churn prediction, cross-sell recommendations |
Your Score: [ ] / 5
The Audit Scorecard
Fill in your scores:
AGENCY TECHNOLOGY AUDIT SCORECARD
â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”
Category Score Max
â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”
1. Agency Management System [_] 5
2. Comparative Rating [_] 5
3. Workflow Automation [_] 5
4. Communication Tools [_] 5
5. Marketing & Lead Generation [_] 5
6. Document Management [_] 5
7. Accounting & Financial Mgmt [_] 5
8. Analytics & Reporting [_] 5
â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”
TOTAL [_] 40
â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”
OVERALL GRADE:
8-15: CRITICAL -- Major investment needed
16-20: BELOW AVERAGE -- Significant gaps
21-25: AVERAGE -- Functional but not competitive
26-30: ABOVE AVERAGE -- Good foundation, optimize
31-35: STRONG -- Fine-tuning and advanced features
36-40: ELITE -- Best-in-class, focus on innovation
â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”â”Gap Analysis: Prioritizing Improvements
The Impact vs. Effort Matrix
HIGH IMPACT
│
┌─────────┼─────────â”
│ │ │
│ AMS │ Workflow │
│ Cleanup │ Automat. │
│ │ │
│ QUICK │ BIG │
│ WINS │ PROJECTS│
LOW ├─────────┼─────────┤ HIGH
EFFORT│ │ │ EFFORT
│ Doc │ Full │
│ Mgmt │ Analytics│
│ E-Sign │ Platform │
│ │ │
│ FILL │ LONG- │
│ INS │ TERM │
└─────────┼─────────┘
│
LOW IMPACTRecommended Priority Order
| Priority | Category | Typical Issue | Fix Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AMS (Cat 1) | Data quality, carrier downloads | 30-60 days |
| 2 | Communication (Cat 4) | No text, no recording, no after-hours | 14-30 days |
| 3 | Automation (Cat 3) | No renewal pipeline, no sequences | 30-90 days |
| 4 | Rating (Cat 2) | Not all carriers loaded, no AMS sync | 14-30 days |
| 5 | Marketing (Cat 5) | Website doesn’t generate leads | 30-60 days |
| 6 | Documents (Cat 6) | Paper files, no e-sign | 14-30 days |
| 7 | Accounting (Cat 7) | Manual commission reconciliation | 30-60 days |
| 8 | Analytics (Cat 8) | No dashboards, no tracking | 60-90 days |
Cost Benchmarks: What Agencies Should Budget
| Category | Monthly Budget (Small Agency) | Monthly Budget (Mid-Size) |
|---|---|---|
| AMS | $200-500 | $500-2,000 |
| Comparative Rater | $150-300 | $300-600 |
| Automation Tools | $100-400 | $400-1,500 |
| Communication (VoIP+Text) | $100-300 | $300-800 |
| Marketing/CRM | $200-500 | $500-2,000 |
| Document/E-Sign | $50-150 | $150-400 |
| Accounting Software | $50-200 | $200-500 |
| Analytics/BI | $0-200 | $200-800 |
| Total | $850-2,550 | $2,550-8,600 |
Rule of thumb: Technology spending should be 3-5% of revenue. For a $1M agency, that’s $30K-$50K/year ($2,500-$4,200/month).
Vendor Recommendations by Category
| Category | Entry Level | Mid-Market | Enterprise |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMS | HawkSoft | AMS360 | Applied Epic |
| Rating | EZLynx | Applied Rater | Vertafore Rating Engine |
| Automation | Zapier + AMS native | Agency Zoom / HubSpot | Custom AI (Autoikigai) |
| Communication | Google Voice + Mailchimp | RingCentral + ActiveCampaign | Custom AI agent stack |
| Marketing | WordPress + Google Business | Agency-specific CRM | Full marketing automation |
| Documents | AMS native + DocuSign | AMS native + Adobe Sign | Full ECM solution |
| Accounting | QuickBooks | AMS accounting module | NetSuite / Sage |
| Analytics | Spreadsheets + AMS reports | Power BI / Tableau | Custom dashboards |
Next Step
Score yourself honestly across all 8 categories. Share the scorecard with your team. The lowest score is where you start.
If your score is below 25, you’re leaving money on the table every day. We help agencies close the technology gap with AI employees that automate what’s broken. Talk to Autoikigai.
This document is part of the Insurance Agency Automation Series by Autoikigai. Last updated: May 2026